The achieved sensitivity in the first run is not as deep as expected, largely due to a worse-than-expected seeing (a median of 1.3'' rather than 0.9''). This is detailed in the "NOAO Survey TAC presentation and report", which can be accessed through the wiki. Approximate sensitivities, based on the COSMOS and AEGIS data, are given below (for typical conditions during the first run).

Filter t (hr), AEGIS 10σ depth, AEGIS t (hr), COSMOS 10σ depth, COSMOS 10σ depth, 1hr, AEGIS 10σ depth, 1hr, COSMOS avg 10σ AB depth, 1 hr

J1 11.8 23.27 9.1 23.16 21.93 21.96 21.95
J2 11.1 23.07 8.4 23.04 21.76 21.88 21.82
J3 9.2 22.69 6.8 22.65 21.49 21.61 21.55
H1 21.3 22.76 7.5 22.12 21.10 21.03 21.07
H2 9.0 22.19 8.8 22.30 21.00 21.12 21.06
K 8.6 22.13 7.7 22.34 20.96 21.23 21.10

Filter	t (hr), AEGIS	10σ depth, AEGIS	t (hr), COSMOS	10σ depth, COSMOS	10σ depth, 1hr, AEGIS	10σ depth, 1hr, COSMOS	avg 10σ AB depth, 1 hr
J1	11.8	23.27	9.1	23.16	21.93	21.96	21.95
J2	11.1	23.07	8.4	23.04	21.76	21.88	21.82
J3	9.2	22.69	6.8	22.65	21.49	21.61	21.55
H1	21.3	22.76	7.5	22.12	21.10	21.03	21.07
H2	9.0	22.19	8.8	22.30	21.00	21.12	21.06
K	8.6	22.13	7.7	22.34	20.96	21.23	21.10

These are total pointsource sensitivities. Note that the results for AEGIS and COSMOS are generally very similar, which reflects the fact that observing condistions were, on average, similar.

We need about 40 hr per band to reach our target depths. In the second (and presumably third) run we will keep track of the achieved depth using the weights that come out of the nmbs idl code. This is detailed in Run 2: Depth tracking.